Alana Rosenstein Become a fan
Mother, social worker, dementia care advocate, pregnancy-loss survivor.

---

 

If we're honest, most of us have done it: Heard about a tragic loss and responded — either verbally or in our own minds — with the words "at least."

A 42-year-old drops dead of a heart attack — "At least he didn't suffer."

A friend's parent dies after a long illness — "At least she and her family had time to prepare and say goodbye."

An elderly neighbor loses her husband at age 95 — "At least they had 60+ good years together."

We're trying to make better. But the truth is that when we utter these words out loud, we're minimizing someone's pain. However inadvertently, we are sending the message: "Your grief is less worthy" or "I can't tolerate the intensity of your pain — please tone down your grief to make me more comfortable."

To be fair, the impulse to respond to loss with the words "at least" is powerful and understandable. In today's digital society, we are surrounded by stories of loss. What social workers call "compassion fatigue" affects not just those of us in helping professions, but anyone facing the barrage of stories of loss that saturate social media, newspapers and television news.

For those of us one or two steps removed from the loss, the words "at least" may make the discomfort of hearing stories of loss feel a little bit more manageable.

But for the person in the thick of the loss — the spouse, best friend, parent, or child of the deceased — the pain of grief cannot be short-circuited. We might drive it underground with "at least" statements. But rather than truly making the person feel better, we're silencing the expressions of grief that are so important to allowing the person to work through their loss.

 

To Read More, Click Here….